Rollbar vs Sentry
Two hosted service options for error monitoring. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.
Which fits you
- Error grouping tied to releases, with session replays linked to errors.
Use it whenYou want each error tied to the deploy that introduced it.
Trade-offSmaller ecosystem of integrations and guides than Sentry.
- You want the widest SDK coverage and tracing next to errors
- Your product is a mobile app and crash-free rates per release matter
- Your error data must stay on your own servers
Use it whenYou want one tool that covers every language and framework in your stack, frontend to backend.
Trade-offEvent-based billing can jump after a noisy bug; the self-hosted version needs a sizeable server.
At a glance
| Used by | 6 makers' products · 16 open-source projects | 162 makers' products · 263 open-source projects |
|---|---|---|
| Cost at default usageerrors 50k events | $29/mo Essentials 50k | $29/mo Team |
| Moved to it on GitHubpull requests since Oct 2024 | fewer than 3 | 4 from Rollbar |
| Downloads | 498.7k/wk−59% vs npm | 33.8M/wk+4% vs npm |
| Pricing | Free tier (5,000 error occurrences/month); paid plans by volume, 14-day trial. · paid from $9/mo | Free tier; usage-based paid plans by event volume; self-hosted option available. · paid from $26/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | No · self-hostable |
| Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page | 2 | 28 (15 major) |
Cost as you grow
Both cost $0 up to 5k events; from 10k events Rollbar costs less ($9.00 vs $29); from about 100k events Sentry does ($47 vs $49); from about 500k events Rollbar does ($119 vs $135).
The numbers, plan by plan
| Errors per month | Rollbar | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $0 Free | $0 Developer |
| 5,000 | $0 Free | $0 Developer |
| 10,000 | $9.00 Essentials 10k | $29 Team |
| 50,000 | $29 Essentials 50k | $29 Team |
| 100,000 | $49 Essentials 100k | $47 Team |
| 500,000 | $119 Essentials 500k | $135 Team |
| 1,000,000 | $199 Essentials 1M | $228 Team |
| 5,000,000 | $799 Essentials 5M | $978 Team |
Who moves from one to the other
Public pull requests on GitHub since Oct 2024 whose title says "Rollbar to Sentry" or the reverse — real code changes, by developers in general rather than makers only.
- Switch error monitoring from Rollbar to Sentryneinteractiveliterature/larp_library · 2026-09-03
- refactor: migrate Rollbar to Sentry for error tracking and telemetrydianlight/srat · 2026-05-20
- Convert rollbar to sentrymixpanel/docs-legacy · 2025-07-18
- Migrate from Rollbar to Sentryjetstreamapp/jetstream · 2025-03-30
What makers say
Makers on using it for error monitoring, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.
No maker quote about Rollbar for error monitoring yet.
Sentry gives us one place to investigate errors across Marqly’s web app and API. The error context is especially useful when tracing a failed save, sync, or AI Organizer run.
…use to support our work, which are: GitLab: For Git workflows, CI/CD, and issue tracking Sentry : For monitoring our application hosted on Vercel Uptimerobot : For downtime alerts and t…
…e - Payments Google reCAPTCHA v3 - Spam protection Amazon Web Services - Platform hosting Sentry - Bug tracking Additionally, the following communities have been an invaluable support gr…
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.
- It alerts right after a deploy when something breaks, which teams rely on for continuous delivery. rollbar.comStarter Story
- Uploaded source maps turn minified JavaScript errors into readable file and line numbers. HNrollbar.com
- Dashboards, muting and role-based alert controls help teams manage alerts without fatigue. HN
- Some developers find it too simple compared with fuller error trackers. HN
- Real-time alerts with full stack traces and user context flag production errors before users report them, which matters most for solo builders without QA. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
- Issue grouping, release tracking and regression detection, plus links to commits, PRs and issue trackers, turn raw errors into actionable work. PHHNHN 2HN 3
- Setup is quick, and framework integrations like Next.js trace one error across server, edge and client. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
- Self-hosting the full suite needs around 16GB of RAM, and some teams gave up on running it themselves. HNHN 2HN 3
- For simple projects it feels like overkill, with a steep price and an overwhelming dashboard. PHHNHN 2
- Frontend projects get flooded with noise from browser extensions and vague errors that need manual filtering. HNHN 2HN 3

