Django vs Laravel
Two batteries included options for backend framework. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.
Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗
Which fits you
- The backend is the product — many models, an admin, jobs and emails
Use it whenYou need an internal admin to manage data without building one.
Trade-offConventions to learn, and a modern interactive frontend is a separate piece.
- The backend is the product — many models, an admin, jobs and emails
Use it whenYou want first-party tools for deploying and running the app, not just the framework.
Trade-offThe smoothest path runs through Laravel's paid add-ons.
At a glance
| Used by | 36 makers' products · 58 open-source projects | 72 makers' products |
|---|---|---|
| Downloads | 11.7M/wk | ★ 34.9k |
| Pricing | Free (open source). | Framework is free (open source); paid add-ons exist (Forge, Vapor, Nova, Cloud). · paid from $5/mo (Laravel Cloud) |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes · self-hostable | Yes · self-hostable |
What makers say
Makers on using it for backend framework, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.
Django makes my life easy. I've used it at least 4 projects. It's been around for a while so it's stable and LLMs have a ton of knowledge about it. It's a great project that I will continue to use for life.
We chose Django for its robust framework and built-in tools, allowing us to build and maintain the backend efficiently with secure, scalable architecture.
I don't think there is a better framework for creating web apps with Python, simply amazing!
I use Bitbucket to manage my git repository and have Laravel Homestead running locally so I can test and work on my code in an environment that matches my production servers.
So, here’s what we use; Gmail (obvious) AWS as our cloud of choice Laravel Forge to deploy our product on servers Webflow to power our landing page Ghost to power our blog Transistor.fm to
We use Laravel as the backbone of our app. Thanks to it, we've been able to built this from the ground up in record time, and have it super easy to run and maintain.
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.
Most loved
- Admin panel, ORM, migrations, password resets and security features come built in and work together, so makers skip rebuilding them. PHPH 2PH 3HN
- It is mature and stable with thorough documentation, and LLMs write it consistently because they know it well. PHHNHN 2
- When something is missing, a third-party package usually already covers it. PHPH 2
Watch-outs
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 25 reviews · mentioned most: batteries included, built-in tools, rapid developmentMost loved
- First-party packages for billing, queues, WebSockets and UI let one developer build and run a large product from one codebase. PHPH 2PH 3HN
- Eloquent ORM, authentication, rate limiting and protection against SQL injection and CSRF come built in instead of from scattered packages. PHPH 2HNHN 2
- Its documentation and community are strong enough that makers get an MVP running in days. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
Watch-outs
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 65 reviews · mentioned most: fast development, robust ecosystem, strong community supportWho uses each
What makers pair each with
Frontend Framework
Hosting
Frontend Framework
Transactional Email
Hosting
Web Analytics
Laravel + Google Analytics:AgiledClearCheckbook Money ManagementDGLegacyImagined with AIIPRoyalLaunch Cart, Inc.Live helper chatMorningscoreNoteFormsOnlineJobsRightMessageSocialBuand 4 more
Laravel + Fathom Analytics:Mailman
RelaticleThankbox
Laravel + Plausible Analytics:MorningscoreRecurrr

