Auth0 vs WorkOS

Two hosted service options for authentication. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Auth0 if
  • You sell to companies whose IT team will ask for SAML SSO or SCIM

Use it whenA customer's security review asks for certifications and identity features a younger provider can't show.

Trade-offHeavier to configure and pricier than newer options for a solo project.

Choose WorkOS if
  • You sell to companies whose IT team will ask for SAML SSO or SCIM

Use it whenYour first big customer asks for SAML or SCIM.

Trade-offIts free tier covers basic sign-in, but enterprise SSO and directory sync are priced per connection — worth it once a customer pays for them.

At a glance

Auth0WorkOS
Used by21 makers' products · 17 open-source projects19 makers' products · 11 open-source projects
Cost at default usagemonthly active users 10k MAU$0/mo Free$0/mo AuthKit
Moved to it on GitHubpull requests since Oct 2024fewer than 35 from Auth0
Downloads1.8M/wk−25% vs npm2.9M/wk+109% vs npm
PricingFree tier; paid plans priced by active users and features. · paid from $35/moFree user-management tier; enterprise SSO and directory sync priced per connection. · paid from $125 per connection/mo
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceNoNo
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status pageno public status feed24 (11 major)

Cost as you grow

Both cost $0 up to 25k MAU; from 50k MAU WorkOS costs less ($0 vs $3,500).

$0$100$500$1,000$2,0001001k5k10k25k50k100k250k1M
WorkOSAuth0x: monthly active users (MAU) · cheapest usable plan at each point, list prices · try your own numbers
The numbers, plan by plan
Monthly active usersAuth0WorkOS
100$0 Free$0 AuthKit
1,000$0 Free$0 AuthKit
5,000$0 Free$0 AuthKit
10,000$0 Free$0 AuthKit
25,000$0 Free$0 AuthKit
50,000$3,500 Essentials$0 AuthKit
100,000over plan limits$0 AuthKit
250,000over plan limits$0 AuthKit
1,000,000over plan limits$0 AuthKit

From each vendor's pricing page: Auth0, WorkOS.

Who moves from one to the other

Public pull requests on GitHub since Oct 2024 whose title says "Auth0 to WorkOS" or the reverse — real code changes, by developers in general rather than makers only.

Fewer than 3 pull requests move from WorkOS to Auth0.
Auth0 → WorkOS5 PRs
All matching pull requests on GitHub ↗

What makers say

Makers on using it for authentication, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Auth0
A huge thanks to Auth0 for helping us out with the authentication flow. They were really quick with the onboarding process and even with the support tickets.
SeyftAI, the makerSep 2026 ↗
For handling our user authentication with enterprise-grade security, so our users can log in instantly and focus on their data.
Ada.im, the makerSep 2026 ↗
I had a simple login system using Auth0 and it would unlock access to the premium content on the website.
Tech Lockdown, the makerMay 2024 ↗
10 more on the Auth0 page →
On WorkOS
We use WorkOS for the enterprise identity pieces of Harden, so customers can get the access controls they need without us building that layer from scratch.
Harden, the makerSep 2026 ↗
We chose WorkOS because it's straightforward to integrate and easy to work with. It let us add the features we needed without unnecessary complexity.
Velo, the makerSep 2026 ↗
WorkOS made it extremely easy for us to add auth to our ActionKit playground - we also use them for SSO for our core product as well.
Paragon, the makerSep 2026 ↗
9 more on the WorkOS page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

Auth0
Most loved
  • Enterprise-grade login with SSO and modern standards, so teams avoid rolling their own auth. PHHN
  • Integrates across web and mobile app platforms, with well-regarded docs and responsive onboarding. PH
  • A long track record of reliability that keeps some developers from switching. HNPH
Watch-outs
  • Contracts are expensive with escalating prices and deep vendor lock-in. HNHN 2HN 3
  • Exporting users and password hashes requires a support ticket, which makes migrations painful. HNHN 2HN 3
  • Its hosted login setup has broken password managers. HN
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 16 reviews · mentioned most: ease of use, quick onboarding, secure access
WorkOS
Most loved
  • Enterprise SSO, SAML and SCIM directory sync arrive ready-made, integrated in weeks instead of months, so teams can close enterprise deals. PHHN
  • Organization separation and B2B features come built in alongside standard social login. PH
  • The free tier is permissive, and it works well even for B2C apps that skip enterprise features. HNHN 2HN 3
Watch-outs
  • When WorkOS has an outage, logins fail for every app that depends on it. HNHN 2
  • SCIM integrations have broken for customers, and it withholds SAML and SCIM configs and password hashes, creating hard lock-in. HN
  • Pricing is confusing and gets expensive as enterprise connections grow. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 21 reviews · mentioned most: easy authentication integration, quick onboarding, enterprise-level security

Who uses each

What makers pair each with

ClerkHosted serviceDropping prebuilt sign-in, profile and organization UI into a React or Next.js app.vs Auth0 →vs WorkOS →
SupabaseBundled with your backendApps already on Supabase — auth is part of the same project as the database.vs Auth0 →vs WorkOS →
FirebaseBundled with your backendMobile and client-heavy apps already using Firebase.
Better AuthLibrary in your appTypeScript apps that want users and sessions in their own database, at no cost.vs Auth0 →vs WorkOS →